robots
October 24th 2007 06:39
In Isaac Asimov’s famous novel about robots, I, Robot (which was eventually adapted into the dire and wholly dissimilar Will Smith vehicle) the Three Laws of Robotics were laid down. Every other science fiction author admired the clarity and humanity of his regulations. Although they were broken here and there, many writers to this day utilise their basic principles.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Robots have come in all manner of sizes and designs over the decades. And as we push deeper into the 3rd millennium robots are starting to appear more and more as real utiltities designed to aid and abet the human race.
Personally I can only see tears before bed time. Automaton will eventually seize the planet in earnest and we’ll end up with a scenario not too dissimilar to the prologue of the brilliant sf-action-thriller The Terminator. Robots will have taken over the world. It’s a scary thought, and one not to be taken too lightly, regardless of how absurd it might seem.
We already have sentient artificial intelligence; machines that can think and operate by themselves, without human interference or executive control, and the more we experiment and make breakthroughs in robot technology the more chance of something going awry. Japan is leading the field.
But enough of the serious implications, what about the entertaining kind of robots? The Iron Giant, Number Five, Robby the Robot, ED-209, and Hector from the Farrah Fawcett vehicle Saturn 3. Actually some of those have been not only down right mischievous, but murderous. What am I talking about?! Well, let’s not get too hot under the collar, for a start they’re all fictional robots, created in movieland. But I’m sure US military has been plugging away on robot technology for strictly combat purposes.
I’m a great fan of Survival Research Laboratories. They’re an American team of industrial designers and engineers who specialise in building robots and remote controlled devices that they pit against each other in specially monitored arenas for public amusement. One of the organisation’s originators lost most of one of his hands while building one of the robotic beasts. No, it didn’t bite it off, it blew up.
SRL made a short film I saw in the late 80s at a film festival. I believe it was a combination of animatronics, stop-motion animation and remote-controlled robotics. It was called A Bitter Message of Hopeless Grief. It featured several robots underground battling it out to the nasty end, occasionally re-fuelling from an underground spring of crude oil. The film left a deep impression on me like a strange and troubling dream.
I've included primarily robot robots. But there are a few androids/cyborgs. I do like that metallic skin. My favourite film is Blade Runner, which features replicants: flesh and blood androids. I had a crush on Sean Young as Rachael. "Do you like our owl?", "Artificial, isn't it?"
I've sent the future and it works. Yes, automaton is just around the corner. Best get yourself a little robot dog for a pet, one of those service robots to clean the house, and one of those Naomi Campbell sleek 'bots to service other needs when you're all alone. My favourites here are Maria from Metropolis, which you can see George Lucas blatantly ripped off for C-3P0, but hey, I love Star Wars, so whatever. I love the Nanofly 'bot as well, kinda cute'n'clunky. Bender always makes me laugh though, and that's imperative in this incoming cold climate of metal and chrome.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Robots have come in all manner of sizes and designs over the decades. And as we push deeper into the 3rd millennium robots are starting to appear more and more as real utiltities designed to aid and abet the human race.
Personally I can only see tears before bed time. Automaton will eventually seize the planet in earnest and we’ll end up with a scenario not too dissimilar to the prologue of the brilliant sf-action-thriller The Terminator. Robots will have taken over the world. It’s a scary thought, and one not to be taken too lightly, regardless of how absurd it might seem.
We already have sentient artificial intelligence; machines that can think and operate by themselves, without human interference or executive control, and the more we experiment and make breakthroughs in robot technology the more chance of something going awry. Japan is leading the field.
But enough of the serious implications, what about the entertaining kind of robots? The Iron Giant, Number Five, Robby the Robot, ED-209, and Hector from the Farrah Fawcett vehicle Saturn 3. Actually some of those have been not only down right mischievous, but murderous. What am I talking about?! Well, let’s not get too hot under the collar, for a start they’re all fictional robots, created in movieland. But I’m sure US military has been plugging away on robot technology for strictly combat purposes.
I’m a great fan of Survival Research Laboratories. They’re an American team of industrial designers and engineers who specialise in building robots and remote controlled devices that they pit against each other in specially monitored arenas for public amusement. One of the organisation’s originators lost most of one of his hands while building one of the robotic beasts. No, it didn’t bite it off, it blew up.
SRL made a short film I saw in the late 80s at a film festival. I believe it was a combination of animatronics, stop-motion animation and remote-controlled robotics. It was called A Bitter Message of Hopeless Grief. It featured several robots underground battling it out to the nasty end, occasionally re-fuelling from an underground spring of crude oil. The film left a deep impression on me like a strange and troubling dream.
I've included primarily robot robots. But there are a few androids/cyborgs. I do like that metallic skin. My favourite film is Blade Runner, which features replicants: flesh and blood androids. I had a crush on Sean Young as Rachael. "Do you like our owl?", "Artificial, isn't it?"
I've sent the future and it works. Yes, automaton is just around the corner. Best get yourself a little robot dog for a pet, one of those service robots to clean the house, and one of those Naomi Campbell sleek 'bots to service other needs when you're all alone. My favourites here are Maria from Metropolis, which you can see George Lucas blatantly ripped off for C-3P0, but hey, I love Star Wars, so whatever. I love the Nanofly 'bot as well, kinda cute'n'clunky. Bender always makes me laugh though, and that's imperative in this incoming cold climate of metal and chrome.
| 51 |
| Vote |
Subscribe to this blog








































Comment by Mountain Fog
Infognito
I always loved robots, Robbie The Robot, was my first favourite.
I actually worked, (on a film), with the guy who made R2D2, and I think CP3O, he was an interesting guy, he received two Oscars, one for Star Wars and one for 007, he built the original Aston Maritin, which, becasue they didn't have CIG in those days, meant everything had to work on the car! Well, the bullets were not actually coming out from the parking light holes, but, the ejector chair and whatnot, and R2D2 had a small person in it.
The thing is, at the end of the day, robots will always be someone's servant, they cannot create "consciousness" as we know it, but, that does not mean the right wing extremists will not create "police bots" that will harvest the unruly crowd...
cheers
great pics
fog
Comment by Raoul Duke
Style of Eye
Very true ... fully armed "policebots" ... scary.
Thanks for the great comment.